Green Walmart? Or Oxymoron

You know how some things just seem kind of out of whack? I mean, take for instance my Christmas cactus. For some reason it’s popping out blooms like nobody’s business now that February is here. I would have enjoyed seeing this opulent display closer to December 25th, but then again, it’s sort of a pleasant surprise to have something so spectacular bursting forth in a month when dull and dreary is the norm.

Isn’t it always the things that catch us off guard, seem out of place, that make us stand up and take notice….

This is pretty much how I felt when I read the Fast Company Magazine article by Kate Rockwood, entitled “Attention, Walmart Shopper: Clean-up in Aisle Nine.” The author talks about Walmart’s innovative plan to provide shoppers with a Sustainability Index on all its products. Basically, like the Nutritional Indexes that currently grace the backs of most food items now, these little boxes would give the consumer a heads up on how their individual purchases impact the environment: “…from the greenhouse-gas emissions of an Xbox to the water used to produce your Sunday bacon.”

But wait, we’re talking Walmart right? Isn’t this the store that many people think of as the poster child for American materialist gluttony?

Yes.

And yet, this the same store that leads the nation in sales: from toys to jewelry, food to household items. And because of this, I think even my most fervent anti-Walmart friends would agree, not a bad place to start educating the populace about making earth-friendly choices.

Walmart’s grand scheme to inform consumers of their buying environmental impact is in the early stages, but supply companies seem to be getting on board. In Rockwood’s article she says that a 15-question survey, asking for up-to-the-minute sustainability efforts, was sent to Walmart suppliers last year and over 1000 responses were returned.  Obviously these companies know where their paychecks come from. But from my own standpoint, perhaps more importantly these companies are looking ahead to a time when future consumer spending habits will not be based solely on price, but also on who they preceive as environmentally responsible as well. So the fact that manufacturers are willing to buy into this idea is not a huge surprise. Ultimately, they know they could sink or swim based upon the consumer’s views of their accountability to Mother Earth.

Rockwood also includes Walmart’s general timeline for this monumental undertaking. According to Walmart higher ups, “Chemical-intense products (such as household cleansers), electronics, and food will be the first three trial categories this winter” that the store “will attempt to apply scoring and solicit feedback.” The actual Sustainable indexes for most products won’t be ready until 2013.

I suggest that you read Kate Rockwood’s article in the February 2010 edition of Fast Company and see for yourself what Walmart is doing to make this green transformation. It’s an eye-opener to say the least for most of us whose consciences squirm just a little every time we walk through the oversized glass doors.

But regardless of how you feel about Walmart, the sheer size of this company (over 8,000 stores and over 2,000,000 employees according to Answers.com) gives it clout. And if that power is used for good and not evil…., I say go for it.

Greenopolis.com is dedicated to our users. We focus our attention on changing the world through recycling, waste-to-energy and conservation. We reward our users for their sustainable behaviors on our website, through our Greenopolis Tracking Stations and with curbside recycling programs.

GREENOP4988

Fast Company: How your Business Can Grab the Green Business Spotlight with 3BL Media

The green entrepreneurs I speak with every day have great stories to tell about their phenomenal work saving resources, cleaning our energy, and creating a better world.  These stories do more than entertain; they get attention and bring in business.  Telling your story is one thing, but making sure that it’s heard is another.  Tools ranging from PR to Twitter can deliver your message, each with their pros and cons, and services like 3BL Media can amplify your story to reach more eyeballs and get noticed.

To read more click here: Fast Company blog

The Going Green movement is changing constantly, sometimes for the worst.

This blog is updated daily about environmental issues that are effecting or enhancing our world every day. The Going Green movement is changing constantly, sometimes for the better and sometimes for the worst. R. Michael Richmond is the creator and writer for Green Business Views Blog and he witnesses Green issues and innovations first hand popping up every day because he is the owner and founder of Green Business League and Green Clean institute which are Green Certification firms.

R. Michael Richmond considers himself a teacher and an entrepreneur. That is why he likes to share his ideas and experiences with other people to keep them informed and educated about what is happening in the Green world.

Green Business Views goes over serious current situations that are happening in the world such as H1N1 and how you can protect yourself and your family from getting the virus if you have not gotten a vaccine shot yet. How President Obama has recently signed Executive Order 13514, which requires businesses to have a Sustainability Officer. Also, he writes about Green innovations such as how wind turbines work and how they are making energy sustainable.

These issues are the most talked about not only in the Green world but in the world in general. R. Michael Richmond does not just write about serious issues but he also gives solutions and explanations so you can have better knowledge of the problem and you can solve these problems yourself. Visit Green Business Views and you will find the answers to your questions, and the knowledge that will keep you current with today’s problems.

Carrot-mob Targets Businesses with Green Shopping Mob

Sometimes you can get more done with a carrot than a stick. An angry mob with sticks can get their way, but so can a friendly mob with carrots.

The carrots in this case are shopping dollars. The friendly mob is made up of environmental activists. Their target is a Minneapolis hardware store that is very happy to be attacked. So much so, it bid higher than any other hardware store for the privilege.

Organizers of Carrotmob Minneapolis asked five Minneapolis hardware stores to commit a portion of the sales from one day to making environmentally friendly changes to their stores. The winner was Guse Hardware which promised it would dedicate 100% of its sales on October 24th to making changes that would reduce the carbon footprint of its store at 4602 Bryant Avenue South.

Using social media such as Facebook and Twitter, Carrotmob Minneapolis hopes to flood the store with customers at exactly 3:50pm on October 24th. The significance of the time and date? October 24th just happens to the International Day of Climate Change for 350.org. The number 350 is what scientists say is the safe upper limit for carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

According to 350.org, leading climatologists have issued a series of studies showing that the planet faces both human and natural disaster if atmospheric concentrations of CO2 remaine above 350 parts per million. Right now there are 390 parts per million of CO2 in the earth’s atmosphere.

“Thisis really exciting” says Carrotmob Minneapolis organizer Natalie Gille “We’ve had the opportunity to engage a lot of people”.

Gille says that in less than a month, about 120 people have become “fans” of the Carrotmob event on facebook. That doesn’t mean they’ll all show up on October 24th. But it is an indicator of the level of interest in the event.

“It’s positive. It’s local. It’s engaging the community and we’re helping small businesses.”

Gille and Esther Callahan explain more about how things will work in this video interview done by Craig Stellmacher.

Icestone CEO: “Buy American and Ask Questions” – An Interview with Miranda Magagnini

Today, I visited Miranda Magagnini, Co-CEO of one of New York’s leading ethical companies, IceStone at its headquarters in the Brooklyn Navy Yard. The Brooklyn site, which used to be owned by the U.S. Navy to produce the USS Missouri and other famous war ships, is now home to IceStone, which is waging its own battle for a better world by creating green alternatives to stone surfaces and counter tops. The company, which Miranda runs with Co-CEO Peter Strugatz, produces durable surfaces made of recycled glass and concrete. Their product is not only made from recycled materials but is also recyclable itself. The company has achieved an extraordinary level of certification, including LEED, Cradle to Cradle GOLD, and B Corporation.

Miranda was especially proud of their company’s B Corporation Certification since big companies simply don’t have the ability to be transparent enough to get B Corporation Certified. There are only 190 B Corporations, including Seventh Generation, Good Capital, and Greyston Bakery (listen to our interview with CEO Julius Walls, Jr. here). IceStone’s logo is featured prominently on the B Corporation website. Miranda also showed me a stunning table made from their refined collection (pictured in photo from their website). She also had some cautionary advice for would-be ethical consumers.

“There is a lot of confusion about what ‘eco’ means. ‘Green’ has become something that is in the eye of the beholder. While deep green people ride their bicycles to work, others might feel fine just recycling their paper,” she said. “People have to make compromises because that is what society demands. We all make decisions everyday. There are trade offs.”

Beware of Green Washing

While Miranda was encouraged to see big companies trying to get their minds around sustainability issues and that they are seeing a real business case for the “leaning of products” (or green and lean), she reminded me that it is small businesses that do the innovating. She also warned that some companies are intentionally confusing consumers on green claims. They are “dumbing down” claims on being green. “How many tree frogs do we see on corporate communications? Does it mean anything?”

To avoid falling into these green washing traps, Miranda called on consumers to ask more questions and buy American. Why? Buying products made in the United States helps products that are subject to stricter standards; it employs Americans; it creates jobs; it reduces the U.S. dependence on foreign oil; and it is therefore good for society.

Despite the more stringent labor and environmental standards in the United States, this country has a long way to go in terms of recycling. We are way behind Europe. “And glass has become the orphan of recycling in the United States,” she said. In Europe, 95 percent of glass is recycled and it is sorted so it can be used to create higher value products. IceStone uses post-industrial waste instead of consumer waste because the recycling systems are lacking in the United States. Big U.S. beer companies lobby against increasing the cash return value (container deposit legislation), which would make it worthwhile to sort and recycle glass. The big beer companies simply don’t want to establish the recycling systems to facilitate the more advanced consumer waste recycling, she told me.

But overall, Miranda is upbeat. “I am pathologically optimistic,” she told me. “I have to be as an entrepreneur.”

She sees green products as a permanent presence in the market. “Green is not a trend. It is in people’s vernacular. People want deeper value. Because money is tighter, people ask more questions.” She sees consumers seeking “layers of value,” meaning products must be high quality and the company that produces them must demonstrate that they share your values.

Meanwhile, consumers have a duty to ask questions and find out what is inside those products and what went into making them so they can make informed decisions, which can have a collective impact. It has become cheaper to import quartz from Madagascar or stone from China or Africa, where people routinely die in mines and environmental standards are low, than to source the stone from Vermont. “Every time you see mined or engineered stone,” Miranda urged me, “think IceStone could be used there instead.”

This orginial commentary can be found on Devin Stewart’s blog, Fairer Globalization

via 3blmedia.com

Why authentic marketing is hard (and how to make it easier)

authentic, adj. = of undisputed origin, genuine; reliable or trustworthy

You hear the advice everywhere these days: Be authentic! Practice authentic marketing!

To be authentic is to be grounded in reality, to be real, to be yourself. If you’re authentic, you really are who you say you are and who others perceive you to be. If you market your business authentically, you represent yourself truthfully, genuinely. This is particularly important in sustainable marketing.

That calls for authenticity circulate through marketing conversations tells me there’s a need; a gap exists between who you are and how you market yourself or your business. Why is that? Why does anyone have to be reminded to “be yourself”? Why is authenticity in marketing so hard to accomplish? What can you do be authentic and practice authentic marketing?

The authenticity gap explained

Click here to continue reading…

Becoming A Force for Good is the new business model for the New Economy.

It used to be, not long ago, the common motto for Good Business was “take the money and run.” Other business mottos included “Cash is King” and the all-time American favorite “Greed is Good,” made famous from Oliver Stone’s 1988 movie, Wall Street.
Only a few years ago, in 2004, the fabulously popular show, The Apprentice, thrilled audiences with savage infighting among executives wannabes and The Donald reducing contestants to tears with “You’re Fired!.” At the opening of every show, the words “it’s not personal, its business” flashed across the screen echoing a common sentiment of a decades old business model. Yet by 2007, the thrill was gone. Watching struggling entrepreneurs fired and humiliated started to look like an old Gordon Gekko rerun and audience interest waned. To keep the show alive, the premise changed from “survival of the fittest” cutthroat competitions to celebrities humiliating themselves for their favorite charity. Something in the cultural ethos of profit-at-any-cost had shifted as even The Donald emerged as “a force for good. “
In 2009, we stand at the crossroads of an ethical revolution in business. The global economic crisis has brought to the surface the dark forces of the world of money. A small and vocal few have been writing and speaking about these forces for years. Two good business mavericks, Paul Hawken and Amory Lovins wrote of a new kind of business a decade ago in Natural Capitalism, their ground-breaking treatise on how to make money while saving the planet. It stands as a guidebook for modern sustainable business. Yet few were listening then. At least not enough to usher in change at fundamental levels.
It took a major hurricane to wipe out one of America’s most beloved cities and the world to witness the incredible suffering of innocents to wake us up. The realization that global warming played a part in Hurricane Katrina’s deadly force was a shock to those watching. The film, “An Inconvenient Truth” erased any lingering doubts of our responsibility to climate change for millions of global citizens. Suddenly, in the post-Katrina world, natural capitalism was not such an outrageous concept. While the U.S. has some serious catching up to do to its European sisters, the winds of global consciousness have shifted. Eleven years after Hawken and Lovins’ book, environmental sustainability is no longer a “radical” idea, but an economic necessity.
Which brings us to the global economic crisis, the economy’s Katrina… This financial hurricane set the record for economic gale force winds.  Ordinary people awakened to the fact that the very financial institutions they trusted to be responsible had been flagrantly reckless and threatened the economic stability and well-being of every member of society.
News Reports on both sides of the Big Pond are highlighting record profits and enormous payouts for bailed-out bankers. Public rage in the U.S. and the U.K. is increasing by the minute. The tension between the financial system and the general public has not reached this level stateside since 1929. “Gluttony and greed” are the factors named in the hoarding of public monies in private hands. Big banks are taking heat for posting big profits and earmarking bigger bonuses for their fortunate sons. The firms claim their business model of self-interest as their guiding principle. Society’s outrage reveals that pure self-interest is no longer an adequate economic model.
The new business model fit for the 21st century includes an inclusive world-interest in its focus. As environmentally sustainable business takes center stage, the public is demanding a socially sustainable model be incorporated into modern business as well. Goldman Sachs said recently, “We are painfully conscious of being a force for good.” The backlash in blogs, business journals, and newspapers around the nation disagrees.
The old model of profit-at-any-cost that put Gordon Gekko’s real life model Ivan Boesky in jail no longer works in the new millennium. If profit comes at a high cost to society like the record numbers of unemployed, bankrupt, and foreclosed, citizens will look for ways to strike back at the heart of business.  That might mean far less consuming of products or services and urgent calls for heavy regulation of formerly “free markets.”
Old-school financier John Bogle, interviewed by market watcher Morningstar, states U.S. banking is experiencing a  systemic “crisis” and calls for a “Better Capitalism,” one where we put as much into the system as we take out. The mogul who created his personal fortune by founding Vanguard Group said the current state of finance as well as finance professionals themselves, “have failed us.” He blames the ongoing economic downturn and the state of the wounded financial system on a herd mentality. Bogle says the current ethical standard in business that brought us here “seems to be if everybody else is doing it, I can do it too.” Bogle said in his day, there were “some things you just didn’t do…It was black and white.”
He says the current industry trend to blame government for failing to prevent the crisis is flawed. “What I’m hearing here is you’re blaming the government for allowing you to do what you should have had enough brains not to do in the first place,” continues Bogle. “So it’s endemic to the system, and we have to learn to have a better capitalistic system.”
What Bogle means is that the continuation of the “rip your face off culture” of profit that brought us here is foolhardly at best and economic suicide at worst. The eighty-year old industry legend has ironically become a sage voice for the New Economy.
These days, modern enlightened business minds understand that greed is no longer good. In spite of this sentiment, the financial industry across the globe has failed to emerge as a “force for good.” In fact, quite to the contrary, financial firms are taking more and more for their own pockets and leaving more and more ordinary folks homeless and bankrupt, creating a moral conundrum of astronomical proportions.
How then do we in business make money and still operate as a force for good? Google, for one, seems to have accomplished this business model as well as countless of other businesses listed through the web pages of GoodB. There are movements espoused by Whole Foods mogul John Mackey and business writer Patricia Aburdene that encourage “conscious capitalism.” Other movements include Hazel Henderson’s “ethical markets,” entrepreneurs for “social capital markets,” maverick social investors like Amy Domini of Domini Funds and GoodB’s “Better World Business” movement that represent not just the wave of the future by the wave of the present. These movements have yet to take hold in the slow to adapt financial markets.
We are poised and ready as a society for an ethical revolution in the financial markets. The pursuit of profits without a conscious and constructive connection to the greater society is in peril of becoming extinct. The Elephant in the Room is not an elephant at all, but an out-of-control Tyrannosaurus Rex that looks oddly primitive on the elegant corners of Park Avenue or Wall Street.
The Rex is booking record profits at the expense of investors and citizens alike. The Rex is devouring every bit of pulsating wildlife with its insatiable appetite for more, leaving nothing in its wake but its discarded carcasses. The “survival-of-the-fittest” antiquated business model has become a fascinating display in a natural capitalism museum.
While Wall Street does (and did) a lot of “good” for humanity in philanthropic endeavors, it fails to see that philanthropy is not good business; it’s not business at all. Good Business must include in its operating strategy a clear and concise way to serve the greater society it extracts value from. To be a force for good, it must put at least equal value back into the system it depletes.
What does a force for good in business look like these days? It is a good business model that embraces the “3 T’s” of trust, transparency, and temperance.
Trust is the standard modus operandi of any good business model. In finance, this means honoring clients, shareholders, and the public by serving all involved with honor and integrity.
Transparency is the basic operating strategy for replacing the “rip your face off” culture with creating real value for investors, shareholders, and citizens alike.
Temperance is the self-regulating self-restraint currently missing from market profits and market maker payouts.
The new model for the New Economy is to follow The Golden Rule of Business and put as much into the system as we take out. How do we do that? Rather than taking as much wealth out of the system as we possibly can, we leave enough there for others to sustain themselves too.
Click for the latest updates on Good-B
GoodB Blog

Good Business LogoIt used to be, not long ago, the common motto for Good Business was “take the money and run.” Other business mottos included “Cash is King” and the all-time American favorite “Greed is Good,” made famous from Oliver Stone’s 1988 movie, Wall Street.

Only a few years ago, in 2004, the fabulously popular show, The Apprentice, thrilled audiences with savage infighting among executives wannabes and The Donald reducing contestants to tears with “You’re Fired!.” At the opening of every show, the words “it’s not personal, its business” flashed across the screen echoing a common sentiment of a decades old business model. Yet by 2007, the thrill was gone. Watching struggling entrepreneurs fired and humiliated started to look like an old Gordon Gekko rerun and audience interest waned. To keep the show alive, the premise changed from “survival of the fittest” cutthroat competitions to celebrities humiliating themselves for their favorite charity. Something in the cultural ethos of profit-at-any-cost had shifted as even The Donald emerged as “a force for good. “

In 2009, we stand at the crossroads of an ethical revolution in business. The global economic crisis has brought to the surface the dark forces of the world of money. A small and vocal few have been writing and speaking about these forces for years. Two good business mavericks, Paul Hawken and Amory Lovins wrote of a new kind of business a decade ago in Natural Capitalism, their ground-breaking treatise on how to make money while saving the planet. It stands as a guidebook for modern sustainable business. Yet few were listening then. At least not enough to usher in change at fundamental levels.

It took a major hurricane to wipe out one of America’s most beloved cities and the world to witness the incredible suffering of innocents to wake us up. The realization that global warming played a part in Hurricane Katrina’s deadly force was a shock to those watching. The film, “An Inconvenient Truth” erased any lingering doubts of our responsibility to climate change for millions of global citizens. Suddenly, in the post-Katrina world, natural capitalism was not such an outrageous concept. While the U.S. has some serious catching up to do to its European sisters, the winds of global consciousness have shifted. Eleven years after Hawken and Lovins’ book, environmental sustainability is no longer a “radical” idea, but an economic necessity.

Which brings us to the global economic crisis, the economy’s Katrina… This financial hurricane set the record for economic gale force winds.  Ordinary people awakened to the fact that the very financial institutions they trusted to be responsible had been flagrantly reckless and threatened the economic stability and well-being of every member of society.

News Reports on both sides of the Big Pond are highlighting record profits and enormous payouts for bailed-out bankers. Public rage in the U.S. and the U.K. is increasing by the minute. The tension between the financial system and the general public has not reached this level stateside since 1929. “Gluttony and greed” are the factors named in the hoarding of public monies in private hands. Big banks are taking heat for posting big profits and earmarking bigger bonuses for their fortunate sons. The firms claim their business model of self-interest as their guiding principle. Society’s outrage reveals that pure self-interest is no longer an adequate economic model.

The new business model fit for the 21st century includes an inclusive world-interest in its focus. As environmentally sustainable business takes center stage, the public is demanding a socially sustainable model be incorporated into modern business as well. Goldman Sachs said recently, “We are painfully conscious of being a force for good.” The backlash in blogs, business journals, and newspapers around the nation disagrees.

The old model of profit-at-any-cost that put Gordon Gekko’s real life model Ivan Boesky in jail no longer works in the new millennium. If profit comes at a high cost to society like the record numbers of unemployed, bankrupt, and foreclosed, citizens will look for ways to strike back at the heart of business.  That might mean far less consuming of products or services and urgent calls for heavy regulation of formerly “free markets.”

Old-school financier John Bogle, interviewed by market watcher Morningstar, states U.S. banking is experiencing a  systemic “crisis” and calls for a “Better Capitalism,” one where we put as much into the system as we take out. The mogul who created his personal fortune by founding Vanguard Group said the current state of finance as well as finance professionals themselves, “have failed us.” He blames the ongoing economic downturn and the state of the wounded financial system on a herd mentality. Bogle says the current ethical standard in business that brought us here “seems to be if everybody else is doing it, I can do it too.” Bogle said in his day, there were “some things you just didn’t do…It was black and white.”

He says the current industry trend to blame government for failing to prevent the crisis is flawed. “What I’m hearing here is you’re blaming the government for allowing you to do what you should have had enough brains not to do in the first place,” continues Bogle. “So it’s endemic to the system, and we have to learn to have a better capitalistic system.”

What Bogle means is that the continuation of the “rip your face off culture” of profit that brought us here is foolhardly at best and economic suicide at worst. The eighty-year old industry legend has ironically become a sage voice for the New Economy.

These days, modern enlightened business minds understand that greed is no longer good. In spite of this sentiment, the financial industry across the globe has failed to emerge as a “force for good.” In fact, quite to the contrary, financial firms are taking more and more for their own pockets and leaving more and more ordinary folks homeless and bankrupt, creating a moral conundrum of astronomical proportions.

How then do we in business make money and still operate as a force for good? Google, for one, seems to have accomplished this business model as well as countless of other businesses listed through the web pages of GoodB. There are movements espoused by Whole Foods mogul John Mackey and business writer Patricia Aburdene that encourage “conscious capitalism.” Other movements include Hazel Henderson’s “ethical markets,” entrepreneurs for “social capital markets,” maverick social investors like Amy Domini of Domini Funds and GoodB’s “Better World Business” movement that represent not just the wave of the future by the wave of the present. These movements have yet to take hold in the slow to adapt financial markets.

We are poised and ready as a society for an ethical revolution in the financial markets. The pursuit of profits without a conscious and constructive connection to the greater society is in peril of becoming extinct. The Elephant in the Room is not an elephant at all, but an out-of-control Tyrannosaurus Rex that looks oddly primitive on the elegant corners of Park Avenue or Wall Street.

The Rex is booking record profits at the expense of investors and citizens alike. The Rex is devouring every bit of pulsating wildlife with its insatiable appetite for more, leaving nothing in its wake but its discarded carcasses. The “survival-of-the-fittest” antiquated business model has become a fascinating display in a natural capitalism museum.

While Wall Street does (and did) a lot of “good” for humanity in philanthropic endeavors, it fails to see that philanthropy is not good business; it’s not business at all. Good Business must include in its operating strategy a clear and concise way to serve the greater society it extracts value from. To be a force for good, it must put at least equal value back into the system it depletes.

What does a force for good in business look like these days? It is a good business model that embraces the “3 T’s” of trust, transparency, and temperance.

Trust is the standard modus operandi of any good business model. In finance, this means honoring clients, shareholders, and the public by serving all involved with honor and integrity.

Transparency is the basic operating strategy for replacing the “rip your face off” culture with creating real value for investors, shareholders, and citizens alike.

Temperance is the self-regulating self-restraint currently missing from market profits and market maker payouts.

The new model for the New Economy is to follow The Golden Rule of Business and put as much into the system as we take out. How do we do that? Rather than taking as much wealth out of the system as we possibly can, we leave enough there for others to sustain themselves too.

Click for the latest updates on Good-B

GoodB Blog

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.